logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2014.09.16 2013고정1840
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동퇴거불응)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B On February 15, 2013, the Seoul Eastern District Court sentenced six months of imprisonment with labor for the crime of interference with business, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 12, 2013.

1. Defendant A and Defendant B are the sectional owners of the “FE” building in Seongdong-gu Seoul, and the victim G leased the first floor of the above building from Defendant A to operate the “H”. The victim was notified on June 11, 2012 by the Seoul Metropolitan Government that Defendant A’s delinquent acquisition tax, etc. was attached to Defendant A’s claim for the cause of default, etc., and the victim did not pay the rent to Defendant A after receiving notice from the Seoul Metropolitan Government that Defendant A seized the rental claim against Defendant A’s “H”.

around 09:00 on November 27, 2012, the Defendants demanded the victim to pay rent from the “H” office operated by the victim of “Fmat” in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government E, and the victim to leave from the victim until 20:30 on the same day.

The Gu did not comply with the Gu.

Defendants jointly leave the victim as above.

The Gu did not comply with the Gu.

2. At around 12:00 on November 27, 2012, Defendant A, the Defendant, at the 1st floor office of the Fmatet, deemed Defendant A, the key business entity, “A” to read “the entrance door to prevent the building from entering and leaving other people into the said building” to be locked, and made it difficult for unspecified customers to enter the “H” at the 1st floor of the Fmatet and the 2nd door.

The Defendant, by force as above, interfered with the operation of the victim G trading center.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness J;

1. Statement made by witnesses G in the third protocol of trial;

1. Statement made by K witness in the fourth protocol of the trial;

1. Statement made by the witness J in the sixth trial records;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect with regard to I;

1. Statement of the police statement to K;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of each statute of the judgment;

arrow