Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the defendants is against the defendants for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants were willing to forge the written consent to the use of land in the name of E in order to prove that a road, which was opened on the ground of 1776 square meters wide prior to the Chungcheongnam-gun budget-gun D, was based on the consent of the network E, which was the former owner of the said land.

Defendants: (a) around April 201, at Defendant A’s room located in the Chungcheongnam-nam Budget Group F, the Defendants’ consent to land use; (b) “Written consent to land use; (c) H, name E; and (d) the said principal on the G access package on December 8, 1999, using a black pen on the paper A4.

E. At the time of N. G. G. G., the two parties agree to pack this Chapter B and the road, and the land owner E.C. demands construction by expanding the entrance of the access road more than now. This is, as the land owner is better than the land, and at the time, that the road is changed and the road is built by changing the location of the road at present, and that at the time, this Chapter B was constructed as a Saemaul project, even if it was reported thickness with the Myeong G site at the time.

b. From December 12, 1999 to the Saemaul Project, the construction from the constructor K to December 29, 199 at the time of the packing of the mentment, be completed from the construction to the date of December 29, 199, after stating, “Land-State Budget Group”.

H. E is written.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to forge a letter of consent to land use in the name of E, which is a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

2. A, around March 2013, Defendant A, at the Seosan-si Office located in Chungcheongnam-gu Office in Chungcheongnam-do, Chungcheongnam-do, 344-1, issued one copy of the written consent to the use of forged land as if the said written consent was duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect to the K;

1. Each police statement concerning M or L;

1. Full certificate of registered matters;

1. A certified copy of the removal;

1. Current status photographs;

1. Flight navigator;

1. Copy of the surveying result map for boundary restoration;

1. The written consent to land use;