logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.09.04 2015고단3716
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(카메라등이용촬영)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the defendant takes a photograph, he installed a camera case which cannot be seen on the screen without sound in a mobile phone, and porous the hole in a test color room on a mobile phone, and then fixed the camera siren attached to the mobile phone to the tape in line with the hole, and taken a photograph of an unspecified number of women by operating the screen shooting function of a mobile phone.

At around 13:26 on May 24, 2015, the Defendant, after the victim, a female, who was unable to know the name he had the satus satus in the subway 9 line, operated the dynamics of mobile phones located in a household room as above, and taken a video image of the victim's 45 times from that time, from that time, the Defendant took the satis of the victim's satiss, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached list of crimes, from that time, he/she took the satis of the victim's satiss over 45 times from that day.

Accordingly, the Defendant taken the body of another person, which may cause sexual humiliation or shame, against his will.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Records of police seizure and list of seizure;

1. Photographs of seized articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing the video;

1. Relevant Article on criminal facts, and Article 14 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and Selection of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that each of the crimes of this case was committed on a day, and the number of times was high, and that the defendant's mistake against himself/herself and did not repeat again is not good in view of the taken images, and the defendant's age, occupation, character and behavior are the initial offender and others.

arrow