(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.31 2018노1575 | 리걸엔진

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.08.31 2018노1575

성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of the facts) is only the case where the defendant committed an act in D D' and does not arrange sexual traffic as stated in the judgment of the court below.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, namely, E, the police officer’s “I are the good male customer.”

If you want to receive money, I thought that I will receive the sex relationship.

However, I asked the defendant, who considers this words to be directly done to male customers, to give a solicitation to male customers suitable for him/her, and the defendant was recommended by the police officer who puts down upon Madna.

The statement "(Evidence No. 1 No. 34 of the evidence record), the statement is specific and natural and reliable, and ② The investigation report on this case also contains a statement that "the police visited the customer, and the defendant, an employee, who was sitting on the table table, recommended 70,00 won of the sexual traffic price," stating that "the defendant, as the police visited the customer, and was sitting on the table table," as to the control process (the evidence No. 1, No. 16 of the evidence record) is consistent with the E's above statement; ③ although E reversed most of the statements at the time of the second investigation by the police at the time of the first investigation, there was a book recording that "the sexual traffic has been engaged in the sexual traffic," and the records of the defendant are kept in the book.

In full view of the following factors: “A statement (Evidence No. 1 and No. 49 of the evidence record)” and the fact that E, while making a statement in the lower court that “I will not memory,” the Defendant did not directly deny the facts charged in the instant case and recognized the authenticity of the police statement; the relationship between the Defendant and E; the process of detecting the sexual traffic in this case; etc., the Defendant can be sufficiently recognized as arranging the sexual traffic as indicated in the lower court’s decision.

Therefore, guilty of the facts charged in the instant case.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2017.01.13 2016고단5230

-제주지방법원 2018.03.15 2017고단1988

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.20 2014고단9198

-인천지방법원 2017.01.18 2016노4031

-창원지방법원 2018.04.10 2017고단4203