The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the background leading up to the instant accident and the circumstances of the victims after the instant accident, it is difficult to see that the victims suffered bodily injury, and the Defendant did not recognize that the victims suffered bodily injury.

The defendant did not leave the scene of the accident of this case, and the police officer dispatched reported that he was the perpetrator, so there was no intention to escape.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (7 million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on misconception of facts or misapprehension of legal principles

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below as to whether the victims suffered injury, i.e., the defendant neglected the signal with C EM5 car driven by himself/herself (hereinafter "Defendant vehicle") and went to the left at the left, and received the front part of EM5 vehicle driven by the victim D (hereinafter "victim vehicle"), which was driven by the victim D while driving at the front part of the vehicle in front of the defendant vehicle (hereinafter "victim vehicle"), and ② The accident in this case led to the driver's seat and the front part of the victim's vehicle (Evidence No. 49) (Evidence No. 49). The victim vehicle was in charge of repair expenses exceeding 6.6 million won, such as replacement of the front part (Evidence No. 75 of the evidence record). ③ The victim D received diagnosis from the victim's hospital on February 8, 2013 after receiving the diagnosis for about 3 weeks medical treatment from the victim's hospital, and there is no sufficient reason to acknowledge the victim's injury in the hospital.

B. Determination as to whether the defendant was aware of the victims' injuries is the victims.