logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.12 2013고단4578
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등협박)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 Highest 4578]

1. On July 7, 2013, the criminal suspect violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collectively, deadly weapons, etc.) took a deadly weapon (19.5cm in total length, 10cc., 10cc., kn., kn.e., kn., kn.) from the victim who was under his age of 33 years in the process of dispute with the victim D (33 years of age) on July 7, 2013, and threatened the victim by putting in hand a deadly weapon (19.5cm in total length, 10cc., k., k.e., k., kn., kn.s.) and by threatening the victim as the victim’s kn.e., k., k., kn., kn.s., kn.

2. On November 10, 2013, from around 08:00 to October 10, 205 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s convenience store business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as, under the influence of alcohol from the G convenience store operated by the victim F of the victim F in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon, the Defendant h who works from the said convenience store as an employee, with a large voice, such as “Samo police flus in the Republic of Korea,” causing a threat to other customers entering the said place for about 2 hours and 5 minutes, thereby obstructing the victim’s convenience store business.

[2013No. 06:00 on November 2, 2013, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the police officer’s service in relation to the police officer’s service in the said district by taking a bath to police officers belonging to the said district, and by taking a look at his or her previous district, he or she was punished for an insulting offense. The Defendant ran the entrance of the said district by setting up the entrance of the said district. The Defendant interfered with the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties by taking advantage of his or her desire from K, who was subject to his or her control from K around the region belonging to the said district group.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 Highest 4578]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning suspect examination of D;

1. Statement of each police statement about L/H;

1. Excessive photographs (2013 Highest 4778);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement to K;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a investigative report (to attach photographs ofCCTV image materials);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

arrow