logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2017.06.15 2017고정300
상해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 13, 2017, the Defendant: (a) around 14:05, at the 1st floor of the Sincheon-si, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si, 385, the Defendant: (b) at the 77th floor of the Sincheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, 2017, the victim C (the victim 49 years old) who was working in the same workplace, and the victim in Sin-si, against the scam, was scambling the Defendant’s head debt and scambling the victim’s head debt; and (c) at the above scambling test, the Defendant scam of the victim who was using his hand was flick

The Defendant assaulted the victim as above and caused the victim to suffer injury to the victim, such as flaging transfusions, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated by this court, the fact that the defendant abused the victim as above and caused such injury to the victim is sufficiently recognized.

In the case of a victim and a workplace member D, who was at the same time, the defendant was also at the victim's body fighting, such as taking the head of the victim from the investigative agency to this court.

As consistently stated, in light of the content and attitude of the above person’s statements in this Court, it is reasonable to believe that it is true.

I seem to appear.

In addition, not only the defendant, but also the victim and the victim who were too much long-term relationship, and also the workplace business E&V, which appears to have no reasonable ground to make a false statement unfavorable to the defendant by deceiving the victim, had the victim and the defendant engaged in physical fighting by breaking their hairs from the investigative agency to this court.

A consistent statement is consistently made, and further, the witness was present in this court, and the testimony was made to the effect that the defendant was the defendant, regardless of the fact that he would continue to fight at the time.

In addition, considering the physical strength and character of the defendant and the victim who observed in one court, the victim will have the head of the defendant.

arrow