Suwon District Court-2016-Gu Partnership-2190 (No. 22, 2017)

Cho Jae-2016-China-066 (Law No. 16.30, 2016)

The Plaintiff’s receipt of the instant tax invoice constitutes good faith and negligence (or failure).

(As in the judgment of the court of first instance) The tax invoice of this case received by the Plaintiff is false tax invoices, good faith, and negligence.

2017Nu6853 Revocation of Disposition of Imposition of Value-Added Tax, etc.

AA

BB Director of the Tax Office

Suwon District Court Decision 2016Guhap2190 Decided August 22, 2017

November 23, 2017

December 21, 2017

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. Purport of claim

On December 1, 2015, the Defendant revoked each disposition of imposition of value-added tax of 278,568,520 won for the first term portion of 2014 against the Plaintiff, value-added tax of 2014, value-added tax of 374,984,180 won for the second term portion of 2014 (including each additional tax), and corporate tax of 50,000,000 (additional tax for lack of evidence) for the business year of 2014.

2. Purport of appeal

The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's judgment is as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of some contents. Thus, it is accepted by Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the

(2) The main part shall be the part

Omission

2. Conclusion

Since the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is groundless.