(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단3868

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단3868

강제추행

Text

The accused shall announce the summary of the judgment of innocence against the accused.

An application for compensation order by an applicant for compensation.

Reasons

The Defendant in the facts charged in the instant case is the owner of D-A-Wd-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed-Wed Led-Wed-Wed

At around 02:50 on October 2, 2016, the Defendant was seated at the top of the car of the said victim, which he is driving, and was in the middle of the Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, with the Olympic Games located in 151, and the part of the steering part of the said victim was limited to approximately 30 seconds by left hand, in order to make it impossible for the Defendant to properly set up a port of resistance at the middle of the Dongjak-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the Defendant committed indecent act against the victim by assault.

Judgment

The burden of proving the facts charged in a criminal trial shall be borne by the prosecutor, and the conviction shall be based on the evidence with probative value that makes the judge feel true to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt. Thus, if there is no such evidence, the defendant may be suspected of guilty, even if there is suspicion of guilt (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9633, Nov. 11, 2010). The victim began with the investigative agency (the investigation record 21,24th page) by the victim in the investigative agency, “the borrower was seated on the left hand while the borrower was seated on the fuckbuck.”

I tried to restrain the borrower's loss on a several occasions by one hand.

In this regard, the Borrower made the borrower's losses to the extent that he takes the son's losses to the private sector, without making any son's losses and without making any son's losses.

During that process, the damages of the borrower were operated as the driver and the driver was flick, so the driver was flick and the driver was flick.

The driver tried to fix with the string of the vehicles, but has been on either side or side, and it became a conflict with the first string of the vehicles.

(21th page of the investigation record)"and "the borrower's left hand."

참조판례

-대법원 2010. 11. 11. 선고 2010도9633 판결

유사 판례

-대구지방법원 2017.08.18 2017고합214

-서울동부지방법원 2018.04.12 2017고합230

-대구지방법원 2018.04.06 2017고단6845

-서울북부지방법원 2016.10.06 2016노1197

-수원지방법원 2016.06.24 2016노541 (1)