beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 23, 2017, the Defendant sold a vehicle with the content that “Wenz SL500 / 200/ 2004 / 133,000 m / color / non-accidents” on the Internet Car Phoe Association and D, to sell B Doz SL500.
On February 5, 2014, the Defendant: (a) on February 5, 2014, in the “F store of the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-nam Budget-gun,” the Defendant reported the above sales in the “F store; and (b) on the part of the Victim G, the exchange of the meter market was gathered
In the case of purchase, the distance on the registration certificate is similar to that on the meter and the distance on the meter.
However, in fact, although the defendant stated that the odometer on the certificate of vehicle transfer was 220,000 km at the time of purchasing the vehicle to the borrower, the defendant voluntarily stated in the facts charged that "the defendant was to operate the odometer at will, but it is deemed that there is no hindrance to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense, it is corrected accordingly in accordance with the facts of this case.
The Defendant entered the odometer falsely as above and received 15.5 million won of the vehicle sales price from the victim G and sold the said benz SL500 vehicle and acquired the sales price by fraud.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant's partial statement in court; 1. G The police statement protocol;
1. Original Register of Automobile Registration;
1. Kakao Stockholm details;
1. The Defendant alleged to the effect that the Defendant did not belong to the victim because he/she knew that his/her vehicle was replaced by the instrument board while selling the vehicle. However, the content notified the victim through Kakao Stockholm, etc. is merely that there can be a difference between the driving distance on the sales paper and the actual odometer about about 10,000.
However, according to the evidence of the judgment, since there is a difference in the mileage of approximately 87,00 knife, the defendant was remarkably aware of the important part of the sales contract as a used motor vehicle and acquired the vehicle sales price by fraud.
It is reasonable to view it.
Application of Statutes
1. Criminal facts;