1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 17, 2006, the Plaintiff received from the Defendant on May 16, 2006 the medical care approval for the above injury and injury of “the instant injury and injury of the first infest aggregate, 25 meters high (hereinafter “the instant accident”) at the site of the construction project for the construction project for the construction project for the treatment of the said injury and injury.” On January 21, 2010, the Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and injury from the Defendant on January 21, 2010, and completed the medical care for the said injury and injury and injury.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for additional injury and disease against the Defendant for the “Slule Epid” but was not approved, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation (Seoul Administrative Court 2010Gudan15752). On January 16, 2012, according to the instant court’s recommendation for mediation, the Plaintiff was under medical care with the Defendant as an additional injury and disease.

C. On June 18, 2014, the Plaintiff additionally filed an application for additional injury to the Defendant on the following grounds: (a) there was an “amendic mental disorder or recognition function disorder” (hereinafter “instant injury”) due to the instant accident; and (b) filed an application for additional injury.

On July 3, 2014, the Defendant issued a non-approval disposition (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on July 3, 2014, based on the result of the deliberation by the Defendant advisory society that “the instant injury has no clear evidence of injury, it is difficult to establish medical causation after the lapse of a considerable period of time between the date of accident and the date of application for additional injury, and there is no significant change in intelligence and overall symptoms in the psychological examination, compared to the initial symptoms, and there is no considerable change in symptoms.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 to 3 evidence, Eul 1 evidence (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the plaintiff has an ability to defend himself after the disaster of this case.