1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On February 18, 2013, the Plaintiff received medical care from the Defendant on August 8, 2013, for an occupational accident of “the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the left and left, and applied for an additional injury to the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance, and the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the 5 balance of the

(hereinafter referred to as "the injury and disease of this case"). B.

On January 27, 2014, from January 27, 2014 to February 23, 2014, the Plaintiff received medical opinions from the doctor (B hospital) who is in need of physical treatment and physical treatment for a period of four weeks, and submitted a medical treatment plan to the Defendant on March 28, 2014. However, on April 4, 2014, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the above medical treatment plan (hereinafter “instant disposition”) according to the result of the review by the advisory society, “the state of fixing the symptoms after medical treatment by January 26, 2014.”

C. The Plaintiff dissatisfied with the instant disposition and filed a request for review on May 2, 2014, but was dismissed on July 7, 2014.

Meanwhile, the Plaintiff submitted a medical treatment plan several times from May 26, 2013 to July 31, 2013; from August 1, 2013 to September 25, 2013; from September 26, 2013 to October 15, 2013; from October 16, 2013 to November 15, 2013; from October 16, 2013 to November 15, 2013; from November 16, 2013 to December 15, 2013; and from December 16, 2013 to December 15, 2013, the Defendant approved the aforementioned application period.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1, 2, 4 evidence, Eul 1 to 8, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. On January 26, 2014, the Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff had been in a very severe and continuous state of pain at the time of the completion of medical care, and was actually in need of continuous medical treatment, and thus, the symptoms of the instant injury and disease cannot be deemed to have been fixed.