A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On April 19, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for special robbery, etc. by the Gwangju High Court, and is currently serving in a wooden prison located in the Sinan-gun, Naman-gun.

On February 22, 2017, at around 13:30 on February 22, 2017, the Defendant pointed out that the Defendant used the government-funded goods for personal purposes from teachers D belonging to the Ganpo Prison, and that the government-funded supplies were recovered, and that the Defendant was able to file complaints with the Defendant, and d with the Defendant “low galle, hump, hump., h., h. to the Defendant.”

No practice has been conducted previously.

In the last time, the test is different from the other one, and is Maviso.

“Intimidating” the term “.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties on the confinement management of prison officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of a working report, a certificate of confinement, a sentence 14 copies of the judgment, an inquiry into criminal history statutes;

1. There is no reason [the scope of recommending punishment] for sentencing of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts [the grounds for sentencing of punishment] [the grounds for obstructing the performance of official duties] [the person who has been sentenced to special sentencing] [the decision of sentencing]] of the basic area (from June to one year and six months] [the person who has been sentenced to criminal punishment] of the defendant is subject to criminal punishment three times for the same criminal act. The crime of this case is a intimidation of a prison officer without being aware of the fact that the defendant was serving a prison in prison, and it is not proper to form the crime, contents of intimidation, etc., and all kinds of reasons for sentencing as shown in the oral proceedings including the contents of intimidation.