logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.04.24 2013고정320
업무방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 22:50 on September 16, 2012, the Defendant: (a) considered the said female employee at the “H” restaurant operated by the victim G in the Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, the name of which is unknown; and (b) considered the said female employee as “Y, P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. C., the Defendant: (a) considered the said female employee as “P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. P. C., the Defendant: (b) considered the said female employee as “Y, P.,” and (c) considered the said female employee as “I. P. P. P. P. P. P. P.P. 3, the Defendant: (a) considered the said female employee as “I.D.,” and (d) considered the victim’s labing.

As a result, the Defendant damaged one of the 10,000 won in total and one of the favorable cups, which is the victim's market price, and thereby interfered with the victim's above restaurant business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the police officer to G;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment. Article 366 of the same Act

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow