logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.12.26 2018가단46187
동산인도 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the movable property listed in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, it can be acknowledged that the plaintiff terminated each lease contract with the defendant on December 5, 2014 on the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and on May 18, 2016 on the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 2, and on the ground that the defendant did not pay the lease fee while taking over and using the movables listed in the separate sheet No. 1 and No. 2, the plaintiff did not pay the lease fee.

According to the above facts, each lease contract is deemed to have been lawfully terminated due to the defendant's default, and the defendant is obligated to deliver movable property specified in the attached Tables 1 and 2 to the plaintiff. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is justified.

arrow