logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.08.20 2015가단4243
동산인도
Text

1. The Plaintiff, Defendant A, and Defendant B, each of whom is set forth in the separate sheet No. 1, and Defendant B, as set forth in the separate sheet No. 2.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On September 21, 201, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with Defendant A, setting the lease term of 36 months, monthly rent of 829,840 won, and the lease term of 36 months, monthly rent of 64,467 won with respect to movables listed in the attached Table No. 2 as indicated in the attached Table on October 26, 201, and agreed to terminate the lease agreement and return the leased object if the lessee fails to pay the lease fee.

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). B.

Defendant A failed to pay the lease fee under the instant lease agreement, and the Plaintiff notified the termination of the instant lease agreement around January 2014.

C. Meanwhile, the defendant A occupies the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the defendant B occupies the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2 from the defendant A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entries in Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of the above recognition, the lease contract of this case was lawfully terminated on the ground of the delayed payment of the lease fee of Defendant A, barring any special circumstance, the Plaintiff, the owner of the leased article of this case, and the Defendant A, the owner of the leased article of this case, the Defendant A, and the Defendant B, respectively, have the obligation to deliver movable property No. 1 in the separate sheet No. 2

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition with the assent of all.

arrow