Defendant

A and Defendant C shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and imprisonment with prison labor for one and half years.

except that this judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the members of the Victim G-friendly Council (hereinafter referred to as the “Life-Friendly Council”), and Defendant A is the chairperson, Defendant B, and Defendant C, as a general manager, who handle the duties of the above Victim-Friendly Council.

1. Defendant B

A. At the end of May 2012, the Defendant was delegated the sales of the “H building” from the victim’s end-to-end meeting to the Government of the city of Do, which is the end-to-end owner, and sold the H building to I on behalf of the end-to-end meeting.

Although the Defendant entered into an agreement with I to sell H buildings at KRW 1.8 billion (the contract amount of KRW 300 million, intermediate payment of KRW 1.0 billion, the balance of KRW 500 million), the Defendant reported to the injured party-friendly council that he/she entered into a contract to sell KRW 1.6 billion (the contract amount of KRW 100 million, intermediate payment of KRW 1.00 billion, and the balance of KRW 500 million), and then he/she was paid KRW 300 million from I as the contract deposit for H building at the end of May 2012 and kept 50 million in custody for the injured party-friendly meeting on or around May 31, 2012, he/she used KRW 100,000,000 for repayment of the Defendant’s personal debt, around January 16, 2013, and used KRW 500,000 at his/her own discretion to use it as the repair cost.

Accordingly, the Defendant embezzled 200 million won of the down payment of the H building sales contract amount of 300 million won, which was kept in business for the victim's life-friendly meeting.

B. On May 2012, the Defendant received KRW 300 million as the down payment of H building sales contract deposit from I, but, as seen above, deposited KRW 100 million in the account in the name of KRW 70 million, and deposited KRW 30 million in the account in the name of KRW A, the Defendant paid KRW 30 million to L, a real estate intermediary, who is a real estate broker, in the course of business for the victim’s end-of-life meeting, and used KRW 20 million for the real estate broker at K in the jurisdiction of the City/Do government, and used KRW 10 million for the remainder at around that time.

In this respect.