logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.06.25 2013가합535771
전기요금등 청구
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff’s KRW 90,933,070 and KRW 57,403,00 among them, Defendant Jeju Development Industry Co., Ltd.:

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 5, 2005, Defendant Jeju Development Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Jeju Development Industry”) and C&Wn Co., Ltd obtained approval for the housing construction project plan that constructs the same sub-loan apartment (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) with 729 households on the surface of the 1890 and 43 lots of land in Yongsan-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Chungcheongnam-do. Around March 2006, it obtained approval for the alteration of the housing construction project plan that alters the number of households from the above 729 households to 669 households.

B. Around June 2007, the Defendant Jeju Development Project newly constructed the instant apartment in accordance with the approval of the said project, applied to the Plaintiff for electric use pursuant to a single contract with the number of households of the instant apartment as 729 households. On June 11, 2007, the supply and demand commencement date for the instant apartment was June 29, 2007; the period of the electric use contract concluded with the Plaintiff on June 29, 2007 with the supply and demand date of the instant apartment; the period of the electric use contract was at least one year from the beginning date of the application of the charge after the date of the establishment of the electric use contract, and continued to enter into an electric use contract with the Plaintiff with the same contents as the said electric use contract, even after the said period of the electric use contract expired.

(2) The Defendant Jeju Development Industry, a project undertaker, entered into the instant electricity use contract and entered into a contract for the instant apartment as the managing body of the instant apartment, and performed the management of the instant apartment from June 2007 to June 2007, including the supply of electricity to the instant apartment.

C. According to the instant electric use contract, a single contract method for apartment buildings is supplied with electricity with high voltages or higher than high voltages on one apartment (or one building), and the charges are subject to the total amount of electricity used including the amount of common facilities used (excluding the case where there is any part of the charge other than the house’s electricity), which is subject to the application of the charges for the house use.

arrow