logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2015.12.18 2015나44202
광고대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, upon receipt of a request from the Defendant on January 27, 2015 (which appears to be a clerical error as of February 27, 2015) to produce a restaurant advertisement leaflet, sent a text message to the Defendant on the following day. Since the Defendant unilaterally reversed the above contract, the Defendant asserts that he/she is liable to pay the Plaintiff the cost of the front section as damages.

The Plaintiff’s evidence Nos. 1 through 3 alone is insufficient to acknowledge that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to conclude a contract for the manufacture of the former land or to pay the expenses incurred in the former land separately. The Plaintiff’s above assertion is without merit, as there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow