(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.22 2016고단1358

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.11.22 2016고단1358

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:00 on August 16, 2016, the Defendant: (a) driven CK5 vehicle under the influence of alcohol with a maximum of approximately 200 meters alcohol concentration of 0.109% from the 200-meter section to the front road of the Anam Apartment apartment located in the Jinjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, Jin-gu, Seoul.

2. The Defendant is a person who drives CK5 cars in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury).

At around 22:00 on August 16, 2016, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol by 0.109%, and led the said car to the Inwing Elementary School, in front of the Anam Apartment apartment house located in the front-gu Seoul metropolitan area, the Defendant was negligent in driving the e-learning car of the victim D (W, 46 years old) who was stopped in front of the front line, without considering the traffic situation of the front line, and without using the operation of the e-learning and steering gear accurately, and caused the said car to spread to the lower part of the G-G car of the victim F (age 42 years old) who was stopped in front of the front line.

As a result, the Defendant caused the above occupational negligence and caused the injury to the victim D, such as salt, tensions, etc. of the light booms that require approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F, the injury to the victim F, such as salt, tensions, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment to the victim F, and the victim H (the age of 41) who was on the franchis vehicle, in need of two weeks of treatment to the victim H (the age of 41) who was on the franchis vehicle, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or F;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. A copy of the usage register of a drinkator, a report on detection of a drink driver, a circumstantial statement of a drinkator, and a report on whether he/she is a

1.Each.

참조조문

-교통사고처리 특례법

-도로교통법

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2020.05.13 2019고단5530

-전주지방법원 2016.11.22 2016고단1327

-광주지방법원 2014.03.25 2014고단129

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2017.12.14 2017고단1531

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2016.10.11 2016고단569