logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.01.19 2016고단2066
사기
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant and the victim C (44) came to know at a meeting on November 2013, the Defendant and the victim C (44) agreed to give 5% of the profits from selling the goods in E by selling the goods to the damaged party while operating the stock company D, which is a concurrent importer of overseas prestigious goods, and agreed to give 5% of the profits from selling the goods in E on November 7, 2014, and agreed to receive 30 million won on November 7, 2014, and 20 million won on November 11, 2014, while the business was being conducted with each investment, it was confirmed that the agreement with E was not smoothly achieved, and that it was impossible to enter into E on December 2014, but the victim did not notify the above facts to the victim.

In this regard, the Defendant is guaranteed 5% return on the use of the F department store to the victim in the mutual influent restaurant in the Dong-dong, Dongjak-gu, Seoul in December 2014.

This could be deposited in the middle of three months, and there is an interest to make an investment, and later, the E is said to make an investment with the same money when the E proceeds are paid.

However, at the time, the Defendant was in a situation where it was difficult for the Defendant to return the existing investment money that he received from the victimized party due to the absence of the plan for the E-sale shop payments that he received from the victimized party, and at the time, he asked about the fact that he was only with the person related to the F department store, but in the case of concurrent revenues, he did not have a clear guarantee that the Defendant may enter the F department store because he did not have any intention or ability to return the investment money and the profits even if he received the investment money from the victimized party.

Nevertheless, on December 24, 2014, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim, to the single bank account in the name of D Co., Ltd., and acquired it.

B. On January 27, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at G hotel located in Gangnam-gu Seoul on January 27, 2015, the Defendant received orders from the Victim C with “Isk’s new flaps and flas

At present, the settlement will be made after one month.

. the purchase price;

arrow