1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is citing it by Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

The plaintiff asserts to the effect that if he returns to Pakistan, which is a nationality country, the police, due to the lawful activities of the political party of this case, there is a concern that not only the person himself but also his family may be stuffed.

However, the Plaintiff, at the first instance court after the refugee application of this case, left the Republic of Korea as Pakistan on October 25, 2017 after the application for refugee status of this case, but was led to an attack from Pakistan on November 15, 2017, and reported it to the police on November 22, 2017.

Persons who are likely to be threatened with life from the police of the country of nationality have returned to the Republic of Korea for the purpose of their friendship.

In order to report it to the police or to find it by itself, it has no choice but to see that it constitutes a ground for which it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s assertion.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit.

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable in its conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.