1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and his wife as the husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff and wife”) operated “I” in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and around 201, Plaintiff A received a workshop and provided a house with family members living with their family members in New Zealand, New Zealand, and provided them with a house with a family living with their family members, and a minor baby has operated a so-called home house business that serves as a certain guardian instead of their parents (hereinafter referred to as “the home park” for convenience) (hereinafter referred to as “the home park”). Meanwhile, Plaintiff A also carried out study-related projects with the trade name “J” at that place.

Plaintiff

D, E, and F are minor children of the plaintiff couple, and they were living together in the wife of the plaintiff couple provided in the above home park.

B. The defendant and his wife, as the husband and wife (hereinafter referred to as the "the defendant and wife"), and his wife in 197, became aware of the plaintiff's husband and wife's attending the above "I" teaching institute operated by the plaintiff and wife in Seoul.

According to the recommendation of the plaintiff couple, the defendant couple decided L to have L study in the New Zealand House of the defendant couple, while having L study in the field of 10 years in M.

Accordingly, L from September 201 to May 201, L was put into the home of the Plaintiff couple for about nine months from September 201 to May 2012.

C. On August 27, 201, the Defendant couple transferred USD 7,100 on September 2, 201, 201, USD 7,100 on October 4, 2011, USD 2,200 on November 2, 2011, USD 2,200 on December 1, 201, USD 12,200 on December 1, 201, USD 300 on the old bank account of L’s New ZealandO bank account, USD 2,200 on December 1, 201, USD 300 on December 19, 201, USD 200 on December 30, 201, USD 200 on December 30, 200 on December 31, 2012, USD 305, 305,204.

The defendant couple visited the house of the plaintiff couple around February 2012 and L.