1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. (1) The conclusion, etc. of a construction contract is made between the Plaintiff A and his husband, which is the husband of the Plaintiff’s (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”).

(1) Defendant C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) on February 13, 2012

B) Between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s Jeju-si F land (hereinafter “F land”)

3) On the ground, the studio of the size of the 1st and 4th floor on the ground (hereinafter “G building”).

(2) On the same day, the Defendant D, who introduced the Defendant Company to the Plaintiff’s husband and wife, was jointly and severally liable for the Defendant Company’s debt under the above contract. On the same day, the network E concluded a contract for the construction of the new construction of the new construction of KRW 1.7 billion (a.e., KRW 1., KRW 1.65 billion (a.e., value added tax) with the Defendant Company on the ground of the H land owned by the Defendant Company at Jeju-si (hereinafter “H land”), and concluded a contract for the construction of the new construction of the building of KRW 1.65 billion (a.e., KRW 1., KRW 1.65 billion) with the Defendant Company. Defendant D jointly and severally guaranteed the Defendant Company’s debt under the above contract.

3) On April 13, 2012, the Plaintiff husband and wife, around April 13, 2012, delegated Defendant D with design, permission, construction, supervision, and activities incidental thereto in relation to the progress of each of the above construction works, the sale, lease, disposal, and any of the activities incidental thereto, and the borrowing from financial institutions, etc. of each of the respective buildings of this case. (4) On May 2012, the Plaintiff husband and wife agreed to change the contract amount of each of the above construction works between the Defendant Company and the KRW 1.69 billion in the case of G building, and KRW 1.65 billion in the case of I Building.

B. On March 10, 2012, the Defendant Company, including the termination of a contract for construction works and the conclusion of a new contract for construction works, began to construct each of the instant building and continued to perform a framework construction project, has aggravated financial conditions due to the other construction sites, and the execution of the construction cost by the Plaintiff Husband and wife A is not smooth, and Plaintiff A on September 30, 2012.