logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.08.11 2016고정1653
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A and B shall be punished by each fine of three million won.

Defendant

A and B do not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B are the father between husband and wife.

Defendant

A and B knew that Defendant F, who was denied, did not notify Defendant A and B, obtained a room in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G 302, and sought the above place around March 19, 2015.

In doing so, the victim H at that time reported that he was in the state of panty panty in the above house, and the defendant A stated that "I will see that "I will ambb kb kb kb kb b kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb kb k

“In doing so, the victim’s face was kneekbbucks at knebbucks by force, and assaulted by drinking.

As above, Defendant A and B jointly inflicted an injury on the left-hand side of the 14-day victim, i.e., the upper-hand side of the body room, the left-hand side of the body room, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the defendant A and B (the legal statement at the third trial date);

1. Each police statement made with H and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Amended by Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; Act No. 13718, Jan. 6, 2016; Act No. 257(1) of the Criminal Act; the choice of fines, etc.

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant C) of each Criminal Procedure Act with respect to the provisional payment order;

1. The summary of the public prosecution is as follows: Defendant C is pro-Japanese with Defendant C; the Defendants conspired with F with F with the knowledge of the fact of the crime; the date and time stated in the judgment; and the place known that F was a male in panty relationship with F with F with the view that the injured person was in panty tea; and Defendant A and B are prevented from being exposed to the same as stated in the above facts of the crime.

arrow