logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2016.01.15 2015고정978
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 2,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

The Defendants respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 12, 2015, the Defendant: (a) operated a second floor of the building located in Jeju-si, a second floor of the building located in Jeju-si, with a room equipped with a shower room and shower room, etc.; and (b) performed an act of arranging sexual traffic by allowing, among many and unspecified male customers, to receive KRW 1.20,00 in cash from the price for sexual traffic and to give KRW 60,00 in cash to F, a person engaged in sexual traffic; and (c) allowing the said male guest and the person engaged in sexual intercourse once.

2. Defendant A, as a manager of the third-story building in Jeju City, was aware of the fact that the said B operated sexual traffic establishments on the second floor of the said building, and was controlled by around October 16, 2014, Defendant A provided the said building to ensure that sexual traffic establishments continue to be operated at the same place on August 12, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. The protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the Defendants

1. A statement prepared by the F;

1. Application of the notified statute

1. Relevant Article of the Act and the choice of punishment for the crime;

(a) Defendant A: Article 19(1)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.

B. Defendant B: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Mediation of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.

1. Defendants to be detained in the workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on the assertion by the Defendant A and the defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant A was unaware of his act of arranging sexual traffic at the instant establishment by Defendant B.

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, namely, the instant building owned by Defendant A’s father G or Defendant A resided in the third floor of the instant building and managed the instant building lease, etc., and Defendant B was on a two-year basis from around 2010 to two years.

arrow