logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.08.17 2017고단2850
도로교통법위반(음주측정거부)등
Text

The punishment of the accused shall be determined by eight months of imprisonment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of 2.5 million won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Gwangju District Court on March 7, 201, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won by the same court on September 6, 2011, and was sentenced to a fine of 2.5 million won by the same court on December 22, 2011, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 4 months for the same crime in the same court on December 22, 2011. On April 13, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 1 year of imprisonment for the same crime at the same court on April 21, 2017 and became final and conclusive on April 21, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. On June 7, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed driving) driving a car from around about 2 km to the roads adjacent to the mutual singing on the singingular road in the Gwangju Mine-gu to the roads front of the D kindergarten located in the Gwangju Mine-gu, without obtaining a driver’s license for a car around 02:25 on June 7, 2017.

2. On June 7, 2017, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as driving of the said vehicle after drinking the alcohol around 02:25, and driving the said vehicle on the front of the D kindergarten located in Gwangju Mine-gu, by taking the vehicle parked on the road in front of the D kindergarten located in Gwangju Mine-gu, and driving the vehicle under the influence of alcohol, on the same day from the G who was under the control of the police box of the Gwangju Mine Police Station in receipt of a report to the effect that “the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the D kindergarten located in the Gwangju Mine-gu, which caused the accident of riding,” “on the same day, the same shall apply to the vehicle in front of 02:28.”

There are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, and it was demanded to respond to the measurement of alcohol by inserting approximately 30 minutes of the same day from around 03:03 to around 03:35.

Nevertheless, the defendant alleged that he/she has not driven, and refused to comply with a police officer's request for drinking without any justifiable reason.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the circumstances of the driver involved in driving;

1. Driving of alcohol;

arrow