beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than three years and six months.
The defendant will pay 224,281,670 won to C who is an applicant for compensation.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[2013 Highest 295]
1. The Defendant, through C on July 31, 2009, said that “The Defendant supplied franchisium and franchisium to the Defendant, Inc., Ltd., Ltd., the Defendant supplied franchisium and franchisium to the Defendant at the Defendant’s new finite Co., Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., the 595-dong YY-dong Y-dong
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to supply the above meat to the NACF, and if the funeral service is well used for personal purposes, the price of supply to the victim company was given, and if the funeral service is well known, the price of supply to the victim company was not given to the victim company.
The Defendant deceivingd D as above, and acquired the victim’s 5,711,65km market price from July 31, 2009 to August 11, 2009 58,308,835 won.
(However, the 23,483,930 out of the above fraud amount 58,308,835 won is repaid). 2. On June 2008, the fraud defendant against the victim C told the victim C to supply the scam in a non-scambling place.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to supply the above fry to the GFFC, and if funeral service is performed well for personal purposes, it would give the price to the victim, and if funeral service is well known, it would not give the price to the victim.
The Defendant deceptioned D as above, and acquired the victim’s kg market price from June 20, 2008 to August 19, 2008 by deceptioning the amount equivalent to KRW 385,281,670 from June 20 to August 19, 208.
(However, the above fraud amount of KRW 161,00,000 out of KRW 385,281,670 shall be repaid).
1. On May 15, 2010, the Defendant said on the part of the victim E that “the Defendant would pay the price immediately upon the arrival of the goods supplied” to the victim at the (ju)G office located in the Defendant’s management location located in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F. F. 402.
However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the land price to the victim.
As above, the defendant deceivings the victim and belongs to it.