A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 17, 2015, the Defendant, who committed the crime of October 17, 2015, sought credit from the victim “EM” working for the victim D (son, 27 years old) in Namyang-si, Namyang-si on October 17, 2015, and demanded the victim to pay credit, but “if money is short of money, it would place the goods and bring the remainder of money” to the victim.

B. Whether it neglects B/L

“Catched” and batd the victim’s chest by drinking bat, and assaulting the victim’s chest once.

2. A crime committed on November 21, 2015;

A. On November 21, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim H ( South and the age of 23) who was a customer who was taking meals on the side tables at “G cafeteria” located in F, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, Namyang-si, on the ground that the victim H (the age of South and the age of 23) was sleeped, and assaulted, by hand, the victim’s chest, tightly flap and flap and flap, etc.

B. Around 13:10 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the victim’s restaurant operation work by force by forcing the victim to buy alcohol at “K cafeteria” operated by the victim J, Nam-si, Namyang-si; (b) seeing the victim’s desire that he would not sell alcohol because he did not engage in his business; and (c) seeing that “the victim would be unable to engage in Chewing business and show what he would be inside and what he would be,” and she would interfere with approximately 30 minutes of the victim’s restaurant operation work.

(c)

The Defendant, at the time, at the time, at the time, and place set forth in paragraph 2-b, threatened the victim L( South, 50 years of age) who was living there, with “if you drink so, they must do so, she must do so, she must do so, and she must do so.” The Defendant expressed the attitude of threatening the victim to inflict bodily harm on the victim.

(d)

The Defendant interfered with his duties on the same day, at around 22:50 on the Namyang-si, demanded the payment of the food value from the injured person’s “O restaurant” operated by the injured person N in the Namyang-si, hereinafter “the report is made, there is no Chewing money,” and sound to the name in which he was located.