1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: the witness V of the court of this case, which is insufficient to acknowledge the plaintiff’s assertion, shall be rejected; and since the reasoning of the court of first instance is the same as that of the court of first instance except for the dismissal of the corresponding part of the court of first instance, it shall be accepted as it is by the main text of Article 420 of

Part 3 of the first instance court's decision "6, 7, 11, 12, 8, 17, and 6 each point" is "6, 7, 11, 12, 18, 17, and 6."

The 7th day of the first instance court's 16th day of the 7th instance court's decision "Fuh 100 square meters" shall be "h 82 square meters."

Under the seventh sentence of the first instance court, the second sentence "after prosecution" shall be read as "after the second".

Part 8 of the decision of the first instance court " June 4, 1974" shall be read as " June 14, 1974".

The 10th attached list of the decision of the first instance court shall be followed as shown in the attached list of this case.

In the table No. 11 of the decision of the first instance court, the part connecting "6, 7, 11, 12, 8, 17, and 6 in order" in the table No. 3 of the table No. 11 shall read "6, 7, 11, 12, 18, 17, and 6 in order."

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and all appeals against the Defendants by the Plaintiff are dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.