(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.10.30 2019고단2478

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 청주지방법원 2020.10.30 2019고단2478

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2019 Highest 2478] On December 11, 2018, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant would pay 2.5 million won in advance to the victim within the “Dda” operated by the victim C in Chungcheong-gun B, Chungcheong-gun, and that “I will pay the victim with the payment of 2.5 million won in advance to the employee from that day.”

However, even if the defendant received a prepaid payment, he did not intend to work as an employee in the multilateral bank operated by the victim, and even if he did not pay it after receiving the prepaid payment, he did not have the intent or ability to pay it even if he did not receive it from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim and received 2.5 million won from the victim as the prepaid deposit account in the name of the Defendant.

[2019 Highest 2731] On May 16, 2019, the Defendant provided that “The Defendant shall repay the Defendant with the payment from the “HDaa” operated by the victim G in Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, Jin-gun, Jin-gun.

However, even if the defendant borrowed money under the name of advance payment, he did not intend to work as an employee from the multilateral bank operated by the victim, and did not pay the money after receiving the advance payment in other multilateral banks, and there was no intention or ability to pay it even if he received it from the victim.

Nevertheless, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim and received KRW 3 million from the victim to the E-association account in the name of the Defendant.

[200 Highest 1281] On July 30, 2019, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “the Defendant would have paid money with an employee while doing his/her work as an employee from the multiples of the victim during the same month” to the effect that “the Defendant would have paid money.”

However, even if the defendant receives the advance payment, he shall do so from the victim's side.

유사 판례

-대전지방법원 서산지원 2015.04.16 2014고단1172

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2015.02.10 2014고단270

-대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.07.01 2013고정209

-광주지방법원 2014.05.16 2013고단2611

-대구지방법원 2013.05.23 2012고단6482