logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.07.20 2015고단605
무고
Text

Defendant

B Imprisonment for eight months and for six months, each of the defendants A shall be punished by imprisonment.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor and one year and six months in the Jeonju District Court’s Eup branch on September 22, 2015, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on April 25, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. A around August 3, 2015, Defendant A prepared a false accusation with respect to E at a shelter located in the 2-lane of Peacedong-dong-dong-dong-si, the same day, and submitted it to the public service offices by the branch offices of Si/Eup/Myeon-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si

After October 28, 2015, the Defendant appeared in the Prosecutor's Office No. 302 at the above Prosecutor's Office and made a false statement after receiving a supplementary investigation for accusation.

Around June 30, 2015, the above accusation and statement were stated as follows: “E appeared as a witness of the above court 2015 order 46 high order order 2015 high order 2015 high order 5 high order 46 high order 5,000, and it was proved that “B voluntarily read the contents of the agreement and signed and sealed,” even though it was signed and sealed by E at the F law office around October 19, 207.”

However, the reason why E and B drafted a written agreement on the transfer of the leased deposit claims around October 19, 2007 is that B used by the lessor G.

As H means that the business is not well-known, B recommended B to open a fireworks store at the same place in the same place, and E intended to have a kitchen, etc., but B and E to prepare a written agreement on the transfer of the lease deposit repayment claims to E with the agreement of the defect that B and E are unable to continue unless B and E clarify the legal relationship on the lease deposit repayment claims on the grounds of the unpaid rent in the previous B and provisional seizure of the lease deposit claims, etc.

arrow