Text
1. The revocation of a trial decision made by the Intellectual Property Tribunal in relation to a case No. 2016Dang990 on December 13, 2016;
2. The costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the defendant;
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 18, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) the instant patent invention described in the instant patent invention No. 1 or 5 comparable invention No. 2007-25272, which was disclosed on February 1, 2007; (b) the comparable invention No. 2010-464, which was disclosed on April 30, 2010; and (c) the comparable invention No. 3, the comparable invention No. 2007/237462 A1, which was disclosed on Oct. 11, 2007; and (d) the comparable invention No. 5, the comparable invention No. 2007-178490, which was disclosed on July 12, 2007; and (d) the instant patent invention No. 201, which was disclosed on the designated invention No. 201, the Patent Tribunal rejected the Plaintiff’s patent invention No. 201, which was published on July 12, 20007.
B. The Defendant’s name of the instant patent invention (Evidence A) invention: (a) the filing date of the DVI connecting rix/ the registration date/registration number: The filing date/registration number of the instant patent invention on March 7, 2013; (b) the outline of the instant patent invention on September 24, 2014 / the patent invention on September 24, 2014 / The instant patent invention provides DV connecting rix and connecting method capable of convenient installation of the tubes installed inside and outside the wall by ensuring that the instant patent invention, which is the outline of the instant patent invention under Article 146312 of the Patent Act, can be separated from the reception body of DVr’s receiving body or transmission body identity of the DVrr.
(Identification Numbers [0013] and 0014] Claim 1]DVI transmission devices and DVI transmission devices connected to DVI transmission devices (hereinafter referred to as “class 1”), and DVI transmission devices.