1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. Name of the invention 1) invention of this case: The date of claiming priority/application/registration date/registration date/registration date of April 26, 2001: Oct. 8, 2004//No. 10-05649 (3) of March 24, 2006: Defendant 4: Claim No. 1) (Attached 1).

(hereinafter) Claim 1 of the patented invention of this case is referred to as " Claim 1 of this case", and the remainder of the claim is also referred to as the same method).

비교대상발명들 1) 비교대상발명 1 1995. 8. 8. 공개된 일본 공개특허공보에 ‘특개평7-205283호’(갑 제5호증)로 실린 ‘열수축성 폴리에스테르 필름(熱縮性ポリエステル系フィルム)’으로서 그 주요 내용은 [별지 2] 제1항과 같다. 2) 비교대상발명 2 1976. 4. 2. 공개된 일본 공개특허공보에 ‘특개소51-39775호’(갑 제6호증)로 실린 ‘열가소성 플라스틱 필름의 연신방법(熱可塑性プラスチツクフイルムの延伸方法)’으로서 그 주요 내용은 [별지 2] 제2항과 같다.

C. On October 18, 2011, the Plaintiff dismissed the Plaintiff’s instant trial decision against the Defendant on the ground that “the instant patent invention has no specification in the detailed description of the claim and invention, newness is denied by the cited Invention 1, and a person with ordinary knowledge in the technical field to which the invention pertains (hereinafter “ordinary technician”) can easily make an invention in accordance with the Cited Invention 1 and 2, and the nonobviousness is denied.” (2) The Intellectual Property Trial and Appeal Board filed a petition for a registration invalidation trial on the instant patent invention on the ground of lack of specification in the detailed description of the claim and invention, and on the ground that “the instant patent invention does not have any specification in the claim and invention, and the nonobviousness is not denied by the ordinarily skilled person is not easily made by the cited Invention 1 and 2” as of June 26, 2012.