logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.09.28 2018고단323
사기방조
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant pays 28,00,000 won to the applicant by deceitation.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 11, 2017, 2017, the Minister of Justice of the Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office (Seoul Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office) calls the victim C to receive money by misrepresenting an unspecified number of employees of the Public Prosecutor's Office to receive money from the public prosecutor's office;

At the time of deposit in the virtual account, it is confirmed whether the new Nonghyup Bank and the Han Bank Account have been used as a passbook.

“Along on August 11, 2017, there is a false statement that the victim believed to be F shall transfer KRW 28 million to a corporate bank account (I) in the name of H on the same day, and 30 million to the corporate bank account (I) in the name of H on the same day.

On July 2017, the Defendant, who became aware of the fact that he was seeking to work as a policeman, received a proposal from an employee in the name of the above singishing singing 100,000 won per day and paid expenses separately, while recognizing that it was an illegal act, he was willing to receive and deliver money for the purpose of receiving daily allowances.

On August 10, 2017, the Defendant: (a) received instructions from the personnel operating phishing in the name of the Defendant, to “Ick to the Hacing point at the Hacing point at the Hack,” and (b) took the direction from 11:0 a.m. on the following day; (c) again, via the telegram, “Ick to move Ick to the next convenience point; (d) Ick the male who suffered from scam on the Hack to transfer Ick to the next convenience point; and (e) received KRW 28,00,000 from F; and (e) sent the name in the name in the name in the name in the name of J to the bank account (K) of J, thereby facilitating the scaming of the employees under the name of the scam.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against F and H;

1. Each police statement made to F and C;

1. Police seizure records;

1. A written petition;

1. Fraud.

arrow