logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2014.08.28 2014고단1534
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반등
Text

In regard to the crimes listed in attached Forms 1 through 7 of No. 1-B in the judgment of the defendant, KRW 2,00,000, the decision No. 1.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc., and two years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 14th of the same month.

1. On December 6, 2007, the Defendant violated the Act on Probation and the Electronic Monitoring, etc. of Specific Offenders, was sentenced to three years of imprisonment with prison labor for hostage robbery, etc. at the Incheon District Court Branch Branch Branch of the Incheon District Court on June 12, 2008, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 12, 2008. On August 27, 2013, the said court was notified of an order to attach an electronic tracking device for five years from the said court,

9.2. The above decision has become final and conclusive and is in execution of an attachment order of an electronic tracking device.

A person who has installed an electronic device in violation of the duty to maintain the utility of the electronic device shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his/her body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with propagation, alter data received, or otherwise impair its utility, and shall charge, carry, or manage the electronic device so that the function of the electronic device can be maintained normally in order to maintain the utility of the electronic device.

Nevertheless, on May 10, 2014, at the defendant's house located in Kimpo-si C building 304 of Kimpo-si on May 10, 201, the defendant extracted the location tracking device's home code and had approximately 44 minutes out of it. On May 31, 201, at around 23:39 of the same month, the defendant had all of them out for about 6:11 minutes in the same manner at the same place, and the same year.

6. 17. Around 00:34. At approximately nine hours and fifty-six minutes of the electronic device in the same manner, all were taken out on three occasions, including where all were to take out, and the function of the electronic device was not maintained normally, thereby impairing its utility.

B. The Defendant, upon receipt of a notice of the above attachment order, should take the Defendant out of his residence from 23:00 on each day to 06:00 of the following day.

arrow