logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2014.06.24 2014고단167
특정범죄자에대한보호관찰및전자장치부착등에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 18, 2005, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for attempted rape at the Daegu District Court. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment for the crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Rape, etc.) in the resident support at the Daegu District Court. On October 31, 2013, the Defendant attached a location tracking device after the execution of the sentence was completed.

1. A person who has an electronic device attached to a location tracking device violating the matters to be observed by the person subject to attachment of the electronic device shall not arbitrarily separate or damage the electronic device from his body during the period of attachment of the electronic device, interfere with its propagation, alter the data received, or otherwise impair its utility, as follows:

On November 2, 2013, at the time of permanent residence around 06:09, the Defendant did not charge the distribution of the electronic device at the Defendant’s residence located in C Apartment 201, 502, and caused the Defendant to take it out. The Defendant did not turn off all of the electronic device until 06:37 of the same day, thereby impairing the utility of the electronic device.

B. On January 1, 2014, the Defendant, at around 07:42, did not charge the distribution of the electronic device in the above residence, thereby having all the equipment taken off. By November 1, 2010 of the same day, the Defendant has harmed the utility of the electronic device by failing to turn off the distribution of the electronic device.

C. On January 1, 2014, at around 14:47, the Defendant left a restaurant located D at a permanent domicile, leaving the electronic device alone, leaving the Defendant’s residence and leaving the scope of responding to the electronic device, thereby impairing the utility of the electronic device.

On January 25, 2014, at around 04:47, the Defendant, as the Defendant did not charge the distribution of the electronic device in the above residential area, thereby having all the equipment taken off, and by not using all the electronic device until 05:05 on the same day, thereby impairing the utility of the electronic device.

2. On June 14, 2012, the Defendant violated the special rules imposed by the court shall not approach the victim during the period of attachment of an electronic device, from the stay support of the Daegu District Court.

arrow