The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The defendant has no record of being punished for the same crime.

However, since the crime of this case is considerably planned and is short of the duration of the crime, the nature and the circumstances of the crime itself are not good, and the degree of the defendant's participation in the crime cannot be deemed to be somewhat weak.

In addition, in full view of the motive, means and result of the instant crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, health status, criminal records, and circumstances after the commission of the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable as it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit.

[However, Article 1 (1) 2 and 3 of the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court below correct the part of the "the defendant is a person who acts of arranging sexual traffic by employing Korean women in the People's Republic of China Special Administrative Organization of Mcario (hereinafter "Macario") as "the defendant is a person who acts of arranging sexual traffic in the Mcario Special Administrative Organization of the People's Republic of China (hereinafter "Macario")."