logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2019.07.05 2018구합90565
해임처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a local administrative secretary on August 1, 1990, and was promoted to a local administrative secretary on November 24, 2003. From March 1, 2013 to January 24, 2016 to Songpa-gu Urban Management Bureau B, from January 25, 2016 to July 26, 2016, the Plaintiff was a local public official who was on a disease leave until he/she was transferred to the Songpa-gu Office D State and was under a disciplinary action.

B. The Plaintiff, around 20:00 on November 20, 2015, at the F G food house located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu, and at 0:0, to G (one person) who is an employee of an advertising agency located in the same Gu located in the same Gu, he/she may exchange information with the same person, and if there are many fines for negligence, up to 70%. On the other hand, he/she shall be exempted from reduction and exemption. At the later time, he/she shall be limited to the amount of rice base value. The increase of the width is not equal to the increase of the width, and shall see this opinion. The portion of all fines for negligence shall be contracted at 200 E, and on the 20th day (2016 years), the head of the Seocho-gu office may be provided with all of them. Before that, 200 G food and entertainment bars, 30% of the total amount of fine for negligence on the same 20th day (30%) G food and 20%, etc.

C. In addition, on December 7, 2015, the Plaintiff at the above F cafeteria around 19:00.

The representative of the advertising materials agency agency as described in the paragraph and the above G are as follows: “I can see that there may be a lot of ever be so wide as to do so. I can do so.” It means three copies of the J course in 198, 200, 3 others, 3 others.

arrow