A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 25, 2018, at the “C cafeteria” located in Seoyang-gu, Goyangyang-si B, Goyangyang-si, the Defendant: (a) stated that, “I am under the influence of alcohol, I would like to be urged to return home from the slope E belonging to the D District Unit of the Gyeonggi High Police Station D District of the Goyangyang-gu, the Defendant called “I am am me, I am me, I am me,” and that, (b) stated two times in his hand the chest part of the above E in order to have the Defendant go home and come home to the outside of the above restaurant, I am me about the defective way in order to have the Defendant go home to check his residence and identity; (c) followed the disturbance, and (d) paid two times the left bridge of the above E.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of reports and criminal investigations by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement concerning E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The extent of physical damage of police officers who have suffered damage to the reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not much serious, the primary offender is contingent, the elderly person is 7 years old, the opposite gender seems to be reflected, and the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act are all considered.