logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.08.23 2016고정1216
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 14, 2012, at the office of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant forged a copy of a three-dimensional contract in the name of G, a private document related to the rights and obligations of which is printed out and affixed his/her seal to the name next to that of G, by using a computer located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government B and 2 for the purpose of uttering. The Defendant forged a copy of the three-dimensional contract in the name of G, a private document related to the rights and obligations under the name of G, which is a private document, by printing out the private document, stating that “A”, “ Address: Seongdong-gu, Seoul: Resident Number: F, and name: G.

2. At the time of the day specified in paragraph (1), the Defendant submitted the three-dimensional contract, which was forged at Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, to the employee in charge of the name-free Gu office who is aware of the fact, and exercised the three-dimensional contract as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to detailed contracts, investigation reports (in the case of G residents' inquiry of the person who has prepared the detailed contracts), investigation reports (in the case of reference witnesses' I statements), investigation reports (in the case of reference witnesses' hearing), investigation reports (in the case of persons in charge of sexual Dong-dong office), and

1. Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the fact that Article 231 of the same Act applies to private documents, the choice of fines), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the fact that the private document is exercised and the choice of fines) that prescribes the punishment for a crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow