209Gohap591 A. Violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Food Products)

(1) (Partially Recognized Violation of Food Sanitation Act)

(b) Violation of the Food Sanitation Act;

피 고 인 1. 가. 나. ■■■, 식품제조업

2.b. ○○, Food Wholesale and Retail Business

3.2.2 Doumping, Company Costs

4.2. Dol, Food Wholesale and Retail Business

5(b)△△△, Food Wholesale and Retail Business

Prosecutor ○○

변 호 인 변호사 ○○○ ( 피고인 ■■■을 위하여 )

변호사 ㅁㅁㅁ ( 피고인 OOO, ●●●, ◎◎◎, △△△를 위한 국선 )

November 20, 2009

주문 피고인 ■■■을 징역 1년 6월 및 벌금 100, 000, 000원에, 피고인 ○○○을 벌금 7, 000, 000원에, 피고인 ●●●, ◎◎◎, △△△를 각 벌금 5, 000, 000원에 각 처한다 .

피고인들이 위 벌금을 납입하지 아니하는 경우 피고인 ■■■ 에 대하여는 1, 000, 000원을, 피고인 ○○○, ●●●, ◎◎◎, △△△에 대하여는 각 50, 000원을 각 1일로 환산한 기간 피고인들을 노역장에 유치한다 .

이 판결 선고 전의 구금일수 전부를 피고인 ■■■ 에 대한 위 징역형에 산입한다 .

압수된 고소한 참기름 ( 1. 8ℓ 10개입 ) 12박스 ( 증 제1호 ), 대양 향유 ( 2. 4 ℓ 6개입 ) 24박스 ( 증 제2호 ), 들기름 350㎖ 1병 ( 증 제3호 ), 깻묵 45kg들이 포대자루 24개 ( 증 제4호 ) 를 피고인■■■으로부터, 참기름 ( 1. 8 ℓ 짜리 12개들이 ) 43박스 ( 증 제8호 ), 들기름 ( 1. 8 0 짜리 12개들 이 ) 37박스 ( 증 제9호 ) 를 피고인 ○○○으로부터 각 몰수한다 .

To order the Defendants to pay an amount equivalent to the above fines.

Criminal facts

1. 피고인 ■■■

(a) Violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Manufacture of Illegal Foods);

From January 19, 2009 to July 28, 2009, the above Defendant: (a) equipped with facilities such as “○○ Food operated by the foregoing Defendant in Incheon’s located in Incheon; (b) 9 air conditioners; (c) mixed tank 9 units; and (d) manufactured a fake oil in the form of insertingte and tension (c) mixed with 3:7 percentage to put in and tension with tension. The above Defendant sold the fake name manufactured as above in total 25 times in total in ○○, etc., as indicated in the attached Table (I). The Defendant sold food for the purpose of selling it after manufacturing it for sale, which does not meet the above criteria and standards.

B. (1) The above Defendant violated the Food Sanitation Act (1) from January 19, 2009 to August 21, 2009, manufactured a fake in the same place, and from around the same date, China's oil and its fort oil (bean oil) mixed with the ratio of 6:4, in a method of inserting and pressinging it into a pressureer. The above Defendant sold a fake name manufactured as above in the form of 13 times in total in ○○ distribution, etc. (a total of 40,936,00 won) equivalent to 13 times in total as shown in the attached Table (II).

As a result, the above defendant manufactured foods that do not meet the standards and specifications for sale and sold them.

(2) From January 6, 2009 to August 10, 2009, the above Defendant: (a) manufactured the same place; (b) 25% of the running oil; (c) 24% of the starting date; (d) 1% of the seed; (b) 30% of the running oil; and (c) mix 20% of the face oil; (d) indicated the name of the raw material in the name of the raw material, as indicated in the attached Table 20% of the face oil in the name of the raw material; and (b) sold the total amount of 49 times, including “a correction as indicated in the attached Table Ⅲ (I)” equivalent to the supply value of “a total of 98, 797, 020 won.”

Accordingly, the above defendant made a false indication different from the raw materials of food.

2. 피고인 ○○○ 위 피고인은 2009. 2. 11. 경부터 2009. 7. 28. 경까지 구리시 소재 위 피고인이 운영하는 ' ○○○푸드 ’ 에서, 위 ■■■ 이 납품하는 참기름과 들기름의 가격이 시중가격보다 현저히 낮아 가짜라는 사실을 알면서도 가짜 참기름 총 2, 520 ℓ 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 12, 672, 000원 상당 ), 가짜 들기름 총 1, 536 0 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 15, 280, 000원 상당 ) 을 납품받아 이를 식자재 도소매 업체에 판매하였다 .

Accordingly, the above defendant sold food that does not meet the standards and specifications.

3. 피고인 ●●● 위 피고인은 2009. 2. 2. 경부터 2009. 5. 16. 경까지 인천 소재 위 피고인이 생산관리부장으로 근무하는 ‘ 주식회사 ○○ ' 에서, 위 ■■■이 납품하는 참기름과 들기름의 가격이 시중가격보다 현저히 낮아 가짜라는 사실을 알면서도 가짜 참기름 총 5, 916 ℓ 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 34, 060, 000원 상당 ), 가짜 들기름 총 1, 938 ℓ 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 10, 695, 000원 상당 ) 을 납품받아 이를 식자재 도소매 업체에 판매하였다 .

Accordingly, the above defendant sold food that does not meet the standards and specifications.

4. 피고인 ◎◎◎ 위 피고인은 2009. 5. 22. 경부터 2009. 8. 21. 경까지 광명시 소재 위 피고인이 운영하는 ' □□ 식품 ' 에서, 위 ■■■ 이 납품하는 들기름의 가격이 시중가격보다 현저히 낮아 가짜라는 사실을 알면서도 가짜 들기름 총 1, 620 ℓ 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 8, 280, 000원 상당 ) 2 ) 을 납품받아 이를 식자재 도소매 업체에 판매하였다 .

Accordingly, the above defendant sold food that does not meet the standards and specifications.

5. 피고인 △△△위 피고인은 2009. 1. 19. 경부터 2009. 7. 27. 경까지 서울 소재 위 피고인이 운영하는 ◇식품 ’ 에서, 위 ■■■ 이 납품하는 참기름의 가격이 시중가격보다 현저히 낮아 가짜라는 사실을 알면서도 가짜 참기름 총 1, 998 ℓ 상당 ( 공급가액 합계 12, 126, 000원 상당 ) 을 납품받아 이를 식자재 도소매 업체에 판매하였다 .

Accordingly, the above defendant sold food that does not meet the standards and specifications.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendants' statement in court (as of the third trial date)

1. ▣▣▣, ●●●, △△△에 대한 각 경찰 진술조서

1. Protocols of seizure, lists of seizure and photographs of seized articles;

1. On-site photographs;

1. A detailed statement of each transaction, a door-to-door transport box, a copy of a tax invoice, and a detailed statement of supply;

1. Investigation report (the confirmation of the selling price in the oil), investigation report (the report on confirmation of the market price); and

Application of Statutes

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

가. 피고인 ■■■ : 구 보건범죄단속에 관한특별조치법 ( 2009. 2. 6. 법률 제9432호로 개정되기 전의 것 ) 제2조 제1항 제2호, 제2항, 구 식품위생법 ( 2009. 2. 6. 법률제9432호로 개정되기 전의 것, 이하 ‘ 구 식품위생법 ' 이라 한다 ) 제7조 제4항 ( 가짜 참기름 제조의 점, 유기징역형을 선택하여 벌금형을 병과 ), 식품위생법 제95조 제1호, 제7조 제4항 ( 가짜 들기름 제조의 점, 포괄하여, 징역형 선택 ), 식품위생법 제97조 제1호, 제13조 제1항 ( 성분 허위표시의 점, 포괄하여, 징역형 선택 )

B. Defendant ○○○, △△△△△, and △△△△△△△: Articles 75 subparag. 1 and 7(4) of the former Food Sanitation Act (a comprehensive selection of fines)

(c) The defendant dedicated to the dedicated to the dedicated to the defendant: Articles 95 subparag. 1 and 7(4) of the Food Sanitation Act.

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes;

피고인 ■■■ : 형법 제37조 전단, 제38조 제1항 제2호, 제50조 { 형이 가장 무거운 보건범죄단속에관한특별조치법위반 ( 부정식품제조등 ) 죄에 정한 징역형에 경합범 가중 )

1. Discretionary mitigation;

피고인 ■■■ : 형법 제53조, 제55조 제1항 제3호, 제6호 ( 아래의 양형 이유 중 유리한 정상 참작 )

1. Invitation of a workhouse;

Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Calculation of days of detention;

피고인 ■■■ : 형법 제57조

1. Confiscation;

피고인 ■■■, OOO : 각 형법 제48조 제1항 제1호

1. Order of provisional payment;

각 형사소송법 제334조 제1항 양형의 이유 ( 피고인 ■■■ )

On January 14, 2009, the above defendant was sentenced to a fine of 3,00,000,000 won for the crime of selling a walves containing a walves in excess of the standard value at the Seoul Central District Court, and again committed each of the instant crimes of the same kind. ② The crime of violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Food, etc.) among them was committed by the above defendant. The above defendant's act of violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes is often used as a walth of the walth of fishing, balth of rice field, walth of rice field, livestock feed, etc., which is often used as a walth of the walth of fish, and sold it to other co-defendants. ③ In light of the fact that the above defendant manufactured and sold the walthum to the above defendant, there is no significant need to punish the defendant in terms of the citizen's trust in food-related distribution order.

However, the above defendant has no record of punishment of imprisonment without prison labor or heavier, ② selling to co-defendants who know that the above oil is fake to the other co-defendants who know that there is much lower price than the market price, and the profits gained from the crime of this case are relatively much larger than the profits gained from the crime of this case, ③ his mistake is divided in depth and reflect, ④ The above defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after the crime are considered, and all of the sentencing conditions such as the above defendant's age, character and behavior, etc. shall be determined as ordered within the scope of discretionary mitigation.

Judges ○○○○○

Judges OO-

Judges000

1) A total of 7,567 liters (a total of 40,582,00 won) recorded in the facts charged is equal to 14 times per total of 13 times.

In total, 6,565 liters (a total of 40,936,00 won) seems to be clerical errors in the calculation of the supply value.

2) The “total supply value of 2,906 liter (total supply value of 7,926,00 won)” written in the facts charged is equivalent to the total supply value of 1,620 liter (value of 1,620 liter).

In the calculation of "the total amount of KRW 8,280,00)", it seems to be a clerical error.

A person shall be appointed.