1. All appeals filed by the plaintiff and the defendant are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

purport, purport, and.

1. As to the instant case cited in the judgment of the court of first instance, this Court’s reasoning is identical to the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal, addition, or deletion as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, this Court’s reasoning is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article

2. Each notice in the attached Form No. 11 and No. 12 of the judgment of the court of first instance, stating that “each of the instant notices (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant notices”) was posted” as “each of the following: (a) the Plaintiff neglected H; (b) the Plaintiff demanded the removal of the front of the E Museum; or (c) the Plaintiff exercised influence over the Cultural Heritage Administration, etc. in the front of the E Museum; or (d) the Plaintiff posted each of the instant notices (hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant notices”).”

Part 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the same contents as attached Form 88-2" shall be read as "the following contents", and the head of Eunpyeong-gu Office of Eunpyeong-gu shall not interfere with the I's activities, rather than interfering with the I's activities, and it is urgent to protect the mother of Eunpyeong-gu and the head of Eunpyeong-gu Office to protect the mother of Eunpyeong-gu.

I cannot ask the head of Eunpyeong and the mother who are public officials of any country.

The mother was sentenced to a fine by threatening a female public official of the Cultural Heritage Administration prior to the appointment of a public official (the first trial decision is reported to the press) and was posted a professor of sexual harassment at the University, and even took verbal abuse against victimized students, and even filed a complaint against victimized students against defamation.

(In case of injured students, they shall send official doors representing the position of the building operators who are accused or accused twice due to the violation of cultural heritage-related laws by the Gu office and the office in the building owned by the building operator immediately after the dispatch of official letters.