logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.07.26 2013고단1927
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. A on March 6, 2004, an employee of the defendant specified in the facts charged, around 15:05 and the same year;

5. 8. 12:23 around 12:23, the act of violating the restriction on vehicle operation on the roads prior to the examination site of Goyang-do National Road 14 in Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-do. 2. The penal provisions applied to a summary order subject to review are retroactively invalidated pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality [the Constitutional Court Decision 201Hun-Ga24, December 29, 201; 201Hun-Ga38, October 28, 2010, Supreme Court Decision 2008Hun-Ga17, July 30, 2009]. Thus, the defendant is acquitted pursuant to the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow