logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.01.14 2015고정3042
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From July 20, 2015 to July 28, 2015, the Defendant, in violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (i.e., brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), arranged commercial sex acts by having unspecified male customers D, a female employee, receive KRW 100,000,00 from other unspecified male customers who were found there at the same time, and from July 20, 2015, in the “C” in the operation of the Defendant, which was located underground and underground.

2. A person who violates the Health and Cleanup Zone of a school is prohibited from operating a business establishment providing services that are likely to engage in physical contacts, exposure to a sealed part, etc. between unspecified persons or commit similar acts in the cleanup Zone of a school. However, the Defendant operated a commercial sex business establishment in the vicinity of a kindergarten, which is located in the Cleanup Zone of a school, and installed facilities prohibited in the Environmental Cleanup and Cleanup Zone of a school.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Land utilization plan;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, Including Arranging of elective sexual traffic (the point of arranging sexual traffic for business purposes), Articles 19 (2) and 6 (1) 19 of the School Health Act (the point of operating a sexual traffic business establishment in a school environment sanitation and cleanup zone), and the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, taking into account the fact that the Defendant, for the reason of sentencing of the provisional payment order, has employed a new employee at the same place after the control of sexual traffic brokerage, and led to the instant crime, shall be determined by taking into account

arrow