logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.05.07 2014고단2841
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 6, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint assault) committed a violation of the victim E (the age of 49), victim F, victim F (the age of 52), victim G (the age of 40), and Si expenses on the ground that the Defendant passed the front of the D building in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si around 0:30 on July 6, 2014, and was punished by the victim E (the age of 49), victim F (the age of 52), victim G (the age of 40) and Si expenses, and C took time when the victims' face by being pushed back and drinking the victims' body several times, and the Defendant took the face of the victims.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted victims jointly with C.

2. On July 6, 2014, around 01:00, the Defendant expressed the desire to obstruct performance of official duties and the Defendant’s injury to police officers within the Ansan-gu Hamsan Police Station G in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and at one time at the time, he was removed from J from the Defendant, who was the victim, while she laid down Handphones and carried scams with Handphones and scams.

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers related to the maintenance of order, and at the same time, the victim failed to receive approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

3. On July 6, 2014, around 01:45, the Defendant damaged public objects so that, within the I district of the Ansan-gu, Ansan-si, Annsan-si Police Station I of the Ansan-gu, Annsan-si, Annsan-si, the Defendant destroyed the repair cost, where it is impossible to find out, due to the Defendant’s walking a picture board installed between the suspect’s seat and the entrance.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made in each police interrogation protocol against G, F, and E;

1. Statement made by each police officer of J, K, and L;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes described in the J;

1. Article 2(2) and Article 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow