logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2019.12.11 2017가단28770
임차보증금반환
Text

1.(a)

Defendant D, E, F, G, H, and I are simultaneously with the delivery from the Plaintiff of the volume of 51.77 square meters in Bupyeong-gu, Incheon.

Reasons

Attached Form

The facts of the cause of the claim and the changed cause of the claim shall be acknowledged in full view of the evidence of Nos. 1 through 3 (including serial numbers), and the whole purport of the pleading.

According to the above facts, the defendants are obligated to jointly return the lease deposit to the plaintiff as the heir of the deceased L, who is the lessor (However, the defendant B is within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased L according to the inheritance limited approval) at the same time as the delivery of the leased object from the plaintiff who is the lessee.

As to this, Defendant D asserted that he renounced inheritance, but it is not sufficient to recognize it only by the evidence No. 1 of E, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, Defendant D’s above assertion is without merit.

The plaintiff's claim is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow