logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원고양지원 2016.01.14 2015가단18704
전세보증금반환
Text

1. The Plaintiff simultaneously with the delivery of real estate stated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B is from the network D.

Reasons

On March 15, 201, the Plaintiff entered the lease contract with the deceased as KRW 80,00,00 with respect to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) and paid KRW 80,00,000 with respect to the lease deposit during the lease period from April 15, 201 to April 14, 201, and paid KRW 80,000 with respect to the lease deposit. On April 14, 201, while the lease period has been extended by implied renewal after April 14, 2013, the Plaintiff was deceased on April 9, 2015, the Plaintiff was unable to file the above report with the deceased’s heir, E, G, B, H, I, J, L (former) and the deceased’s spouse as the Plaintiff’s heir, and the Plaintiff’s heir, 25, 15, 205, 15, 205, 205, 2015, G.

Therefore, the Defendants inherited the obligation to return the pre-tax deposit to the Plaintiff in their respective shares of 1/2, and therefore, at the same time, the instant apartment complex was delivered from the Plaintiff. Defendant B, within the scope of the property inherited from the network D (=80,000,000 x 1/2 of the inheritance shares x 40,000,000 won (=80,000 x 80,000,000 x 1/2 of the inheritance shares). Defendant C is obligated to pay the inheritance shares.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case against the defendants is accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claim is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow