beta
Text
The judgment below
A final and conclusive verdict of not guilty shall be made on June 28, 2014, April 11, 2015, April 16, 2015, April 16, 2015, the person who committed April 24, 2015, the person who committed April 24, 2015, and the person who committed May 1, 2015, respectively.
Reasons
1. Scope of the judgment of this court;
A. The prosecutor’s proceeding 1) The Assembly and Demonstration Act (hereinafter “the Assembly and Demonstration Act”) on May 3, 2014 (hereinafter “the Assembly and Demonstration Act”) is limited to the Defendant.
) Violation of the Act, the violation of the Act as of May 18, 2014, the violation of the Act as of June 10, 2014, the violation of the Act as of June 10, 2014, the violation of the Act as of June 28, 2014, the general traffic obstruction as of June 28, 2014, the general traffic obstruction as of April 11, 2015, the general traffic obstruction as of April 16, 2015, the general traffic obstruction as of April 24, 2015, the general traffic obstruction as of May 1, 2015, the violation of the Act as of September 23, 2015, and the violation of the Act as to the violation of the Act as of November 14, 2015, the lower court acquitted the Defendant on the remaining charges of violation of the Act on the grounds that each of the above charges was found not guilty (the remaining charges of violation of the Act).
Before remanding, the court below accepted part of the appeal against the defendant's conviction with the prosecutor's appeal against the acquittal portion, and reversed the judgment below in its entirety, and sentenced the defendant not guilty as to each of the general traffic obstruction as of April 28, 2014, April 11, 2015, April 16, 2015, May 24, 2015, May 14, 2015, and November 14, 2015, and sentenced the rest of the facts charged (the violation of the Act as of May 3, 2014, the violation of the Act as of May 18, 2014, the violation of the Act as of June 10, 2014, and the general traffic obstruction as of September 23, 2015).
3. The Defendant filed an appeal against the conviction in the judgment of the party prior to remand, and the Prosecutor appealed to the entire judgment of the court below, but the Supreme Court has determined the Defendant and the prosecutor.