logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고정1597
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”), driving an off-to-land 125cc beamed by an unregistered 18:40, and driving an over-to-land 125cc East-gu, Daejeon, along the three-lane road in front of the Daejeon-gu, in the direction of the opposite four-lane, along the one-lane distance.

Since there is a yellow safety zone at the center of the road at the bed, the driver of the horse in this case shall not enter the place where entry is prohibited by the safety mark, such as a safety zone, etc., and there was a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signal or instruction indicating the traffic safety facilities to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, on the left side of the vehicle driving ahead of it, found the instant vehicle into the instant safety zone and proceeded along the center of the road, and operated the instant vehicle rapidly in the drive of D(32 tax) drive in the same direction as that of the Marin, but did not avoid it, and received the said vehicle even in the front part of the above Oba, as the front part of the above Oba.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused injury to the victim F (the age of 22) who was on the back of the above Obaba (the age of 22) due to such occupational negligence, such as the following lusium, and at the same time damaged the Defendant Company G’s car owned by the company with limited liability to the sum of 2,628,041 won, including the exchange of the above car by even before the left-hand even.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, as the owner of the above unregistered Oral Ba, operated the above Oral Ba without being covered by mandatory insurance at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Reports (1) on traffic accidents, and photographs on the scene of accidents;

1. Medical certificate (F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of subparagraph (E) and written estimates;

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the proviso to Article 3(2) of the same Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow